Fingerprints of the Gods by Graham Hancock (Three Rivers Press)

Graham Hancock's Fingerprints of the Gods examines early knowledge of prehistoric humanity, directly challenging mainstream notions of the origins of civilization. The book tells about Hancock's investigation into different ancient sites, including the Great Sphinx, Tihuanaco, the temples of the Sun and Moon, etc., giving hints of an advanced civilization that has since been lost to time. The big question revolves around how this theory can be reconciled with the current archaeological narratives while raising questions on forgotten knowledge and the cyclical nature of cataclysms shaping the affairs of humankind.

The issues raised in this book are most contemporary: how, as societies remember and forget knowledge, humanity is possibly ill-prepared to face again the natural catastrophes that affect our existence. The suggestion that, perhaps, we might be close to such a planetary upheaval has become a part of the anxieties concerning climate change and the instability in our surroundings, rendering a great deal of relevance to the messages contained in the book, even beyond its historical scope. It sets up a thoughtful examination of how modern civilizations relate to their past and what lessons might lie unclaimed in the progress frenzy.

His writing style is lucid yet exciting, combining scientific inputs with narrative storytelling to keep readers involved in the presentation. The tone alternates between enthusiastic and skeptical, creating a discovery atmosphere thrilling, yet speculative at times. The movement in the book is both geographically and thematically directed, creating an otherwise fast pace but repetitiveness from the similar points arising through different contexts. While some arguments often rely on interpretations rather than proof at the end, the style calls for questioning rather than blind acceptance.

Overall, Fingerprints of the Gods is a book that inspires deep reflection on the origins of human civilization, the fragility of knowledge, and creates curiosity and wonder, regardless of whether the evidence presented may not convince all people equally. It manages to generate awe at what the past must have been like and concern for what the future may hold. It fits well with the definition of alternative history and archaeology, starkly contrasting the more conservative accounts while being readily cogent to Hancock, who challenges mainstream history. While requiring caution, for its provocative ideas and vivid description, it still qualifies as a very interesting read.

4/5